|
MSLT
BASED GROUPING |
MEAN
SLEEP LATENCY (MINUTES) |
MEAN
RDI |
DREAM
RECALL (GROUP MEAN) (1-5) 1=NEVER:
2=MTHLY: 3=WKLY: 4=2XWK:5=NIGHTLY |
SUM
TOTAL DREAM
USE [MEAN]
(RANGE
17-205) |
(1)
>2 SORP & MEAN SLEEP LATENCY < 5 MIN. N=15 |
3.0 |
10.5 |
3.13
GRP (1) > GRP(3) sig. = .1 |
28.0 |
(2)
>2 SORP & MEAN SLEEP LATENCY > 5 MIN. N=3 |
11.1 |
7.4 |
3.7 |
25.8 |
(3)
SLEEP LATENCY< 5 MIN -
NO SORP;
N = 18 |
3.3 |
17.4 |
2.47
GRP (3) < GRP (4) sig. = .05
< GRP (1) sig. = .1 |
26.5 |
(4)
SLEEP LATENCY 5-10 MIN -
NO SORP;
N= 10 |
8.1 |
7.1 |
3.3
GRP (4) > GRP (3) sig. = .05 |
31.1 |
(5)
SLEEP LATENCY 10-15 MIN -
NO SORP;
N = 3 |
12.1 |
8.1 |
2.0 |
26.5 |
(6)
SLEEP
LATENCY 15-20 MIN -
NO SORP;
N=7 |
17.1 |
8.7 |
3.14 |
23.1 |
Significant
variability in reported recall was present between the groupings large
enough to permit reasonable statistical analysis.
Obviously more data needs to be collected, particularly to
explain the non-statistically significant, but inconsistent findings
from Groups (5 & 6). Dream use (Dream Effects of Awake Behavior) did
not significantly vary between groupings.
The
significant variation in reported dream recall between groupings
supports the authors’ hypotheses. Severe sleepiness can be shown to
suppress reported dream recall in individuals without SORP.
In individuals with the REMS pressure associated with SORP’s,
dream recall is higher despite the presence of severe daytime
sleepiness. Reported dream
recall could be used to differentiate sleepy individuals with SORP’s
from those without SORP’s. Decreased
dream recall may be a marker for daytime sleepiness.
(1)
Strauch
I., Meier B.(1996) In Search of Dreams: Results of Experimental Dream
Research, SUNY Press, NY, NY.
(2)
Pagel J.
Vann B (1995) Polysomnographic Correlates of Reported Dreaming, APSS
Abstracts.
(3)
Hartmann
E. (1998) Dreams and Nightmares: The New Theory on the Origin and
Meaning of Dreams, Plenum Trade, NY.
Copyright ©2001 Association for the Study of Dreams. All Rights Reserved |